<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Dan Cameron - Latest Comments in With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scattered.disqus.com/</link><description>wordpress enthusiest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:02:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271420</link><description>Yeah, it just seems like the phone service ads so much value to the device that it would be stupid to pick the touch, especially with those prices.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271419</link><description>Well the Touch starts at $299, is the smaller and doesn't require phone service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:10:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271418</link><description>Is the only difference between the $399 touch and the $399 iPhone the storage size vs. lack of phone connection?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If so, then I agree - the touch is a loser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271417</link><description>It's not trying to be an PDA though, its trying to be a the best media player and consumer electronic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would get it if I didn't want to carry two devices everywhere, that's why I'm commenting here with my iPhone and have the curve on the block for ebay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both devices are awesome and if you really don't want to use att but want everything else the iPhone has to offer the touch is there. But I see your point if you just want to play video, the nano is perfect, and of you have a lot of video the classic is there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271416</link><description>i can't imagine anyone getting a touch since the nano plays video now.  i mean, if you're gonna get a touch, just get an iphone...  the pda sans phone model has been dead for years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nstryker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:32:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271415</link><description>Sure, but I corrected myself in the later comment that I linked to above.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just thought it was funny that they ended up doing both of the things I mentioned in that comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271414</link><description>Only after you said &lt;a href="http://dancameron.org/pownce/they-better-get-to-something-good-the-new-imac-looks#comment-269021" rel="nofollow"&gt;you doubted it.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But everyone knew they would come out with new iPods, also dropping the price and coming out with a cheaper version is completely different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Apple has never done this; where they launch something and then do a major price drop soon after. It works out for me though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:07:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With the new $399 price drop of the iPhone I&amp;#8217;d&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://dancameron.org/pownce/with-the-new-399-price-drop-of-the-iphone-id#comment-1271413</link><description>&lt;a href="http://dancameron.org/pownce/they-better-get-to-something-good-the-new-imac-looks#comment-269137" rel="nofollow"&gt;Saw that one coming...&lt;/a&gt; they did the price drop and the wifi only version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even though I still wouldn't buy one, it definitely makes it a much more attractive device.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:32:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>