<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Dan Cameron - Latest Comments in MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://scattered.disqus.com/</link><description>wordpress enthusiest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:56:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185557</link><description>i've always been bi-compual.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nstryker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:56:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185556</link><description>Mr. S. don't go to the dark side, Macs are so dial-up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:46:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185555</link><description>sorry Mr. S., only hippies and Dan can use the mac.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:42:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185554</link><description>and nathan sometimes...now</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nstryker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:25:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185553</link><description>Maybe you and Steve Jobs are the only mac users left.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185552</link><description>No, Apple's implementation does.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 23:11:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185551</link><description>What! unix has design flaws? Bah.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nate</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:27:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185550</link><description>&lt;em&gt;properly configured&lt;/em&gt; Windows or Mac computer will not be vulnerable to infection when it is connected to the network, whereas the "average" setup of either operating system is vulnerable to attacks on a number of levels. The Mac default is certainly better than the Windows one, but it's not perfect, and given more interest by the people writing these kinds of applications would probably be just as infected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, Dan &lt;a href="http://www.nsa.gov/snac/os/applemac/osx_client_final_v_1_1.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;here's a link to a good security guide for OSX&lt;/a&gt;, from the NSA. They have similar ones for the Windows operating systems as well; they're pretty interesting reading if you're into that sort of thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185549</link><description>does that really prove that it's "less secure"?  does security only have to exist programatically?  not that i'm a huge fan of security through obscurity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nstryker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:39:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MS= 7,944, OS X = 0 at Scattered</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/ms-7944-os-x-0#comment-1185548</link><description>I guess I'm going to have to start writing some Mac viruses to dispel the misconception that statistics like this can create. The Mac OS (out of the box) suffers from most of the same security design flaws that Windows does, it just isn't as big a target, so people don't waste their time writing for it if their goal is to hit as many computers as they can.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:35:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>