<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Dan Cameron - Latest Comments in DRM Free iTunes Part 2</title><link>http://scattered.disqus.com/</link><description>wordpress enthusiest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:18:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: DRM Free iTunes Part 2</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/drm-free-itunes-part-2#comment-1270134</link><description>&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/10/15/itunes-plus-drm-free-tracks-expanding-dropping-to-99-cents" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nstryker</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:18:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRM Free iTunes Part 2</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/drm-free-itunes-part-2#comment-1270133</link><description>That was a short one. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 12:31:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRM Free iTunes Part 2</title><link>http://dancameron.org/general/drm-free-itunes-part-2#comment-1270132</link><description>So, to keep this short and sweet, do they or do they not allow content owners (record companies or independents) to sell music without DRM *AND* without the 30% markup?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If no, then I rest my case until there are further developments; no need to rehash why I think both of those conditions must be met.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JaredB</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:19:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>